Who are We?
What do we do?
Latest News
Free Resources
Links
FAQ on Hinduism

The well recognized icon of Lord Sri
Krishna imparting the eternal verities of the Dharma to his
disciple Arjuna at the inception of the The Great Bharata
Battle dating approximately to the 4th millennium BCE
FAQ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in
comparison to the poverty stricken conditions
prevalent during much of the 20th century ? |
|
-
What is the situation regarding the Caste
system in Hindu society ? Was such a
system endorsed by the ancient Vedics in any
of the scriptures. Did the Hindu
scriptures endorse Untouchability ?
-
What are
the central core tenets of the Sanatana
Dharma ? If you had to pick the most
important 5 among them which ones
would you pick
|
LOOK TO THIS DAY
Look to this day!
For it is Life, the very Breath of Life.
In its brief course lie all the varieties
And realities of your existence :
The bliss of growth,
The glory of action,
The splendor of beauty.
For yesterday is already a dream,
And tomorrow is only a vision;
But today well-lived, makes every
Yesterday a dream of happiness
And every tomorrow a vision of hope.
Look well therefore to this day!
Such is the salutation of the dawn.
- Sanskrit Verse
attributed
to Kalidasa in Ushavandanam
(thanks to
Sheshadri for pointing this out to me
webmaster@indicethos.org |
Topics
The Sacred Texts
The corpus of Scriptures
The ethics and
responsibilities
The Goals of life
The Underlying
Philosophies
Puranas and Itihaasa
Yogashastra and Brahmavidya
Aham Brahmasmi
Tat Twam Asi
Prajnanam Brahman
Ayam Atma Brahman
-
What is the meaning of the Om symbol ?
OM is the single most ubiquitous symbol in all of Hinduism
The symbol Om, Ohm or Aum is
believed to be the primordial sound that emanated
during the creation of the Universe
-
It is made up of three
separate sounds, and saying these together makes Om
the ultimate mantra.
-
Saying the three sounds
together in the right way helps to awaken the inner
self, the atman, which is a spark from the divine
Brahman. When said in this way, Om is called Pranava,
the sacred sound (sacred humming).
-
It is the representation of
Brahman, who is unreachable and unknowable. By using
the symbol (or saying the word), Hindus can approach
Brahman in both the mystical and earth-bound planes.
-
The symbol has enormous
significance in Hindu life, appearing everywhere
on temples, on amulets worn by almost everyone and
even painted onto the tongue of newborns using
honey, to welcome them into life.
The Mandukya Upanishad has an excellent
discussion on the significance of the Om sound. See the
section on the Upanishads
for a overview of the main Upanishads.
-
What
are the main scriptures (Shastra) of the Hindu ?
To those who
are relatively unfamiliar with the Hindu Dharma, the
vast panoply and canon of Hindu shastras is both
bewildering and overwhelming. Just as there is order in
the cosmos, an order that needs effort and diligence to
discover and comprehend, so also it is the case with the
discovery of the ontology and structure of the Dharma,
an effort which I might add is more than rewarding.
Shastra
is a Sanskrit word used to denote education/knowledge in
a general sense. The word is generally used as a suffix
in the context of technical or specialized knowledge in
a defined area of practice. For example, Astra shastra
means, knowledge about "Handling of weapons", Astra
means weapons, and Shastra is their knowledge
The
scripture of the Hindu is broadly divided into Shruti
(Sanskrit ?????? , that which is
heard) and Smriti
(??????????,that which is remembered)
Shruti
, the main body of the Hindu canonical scripture,
comprises the following
The Veda or Vedas - the
Rig-Veda, the Sama-Veda, the Atharva-Veda, the Yajur-Veda.
The four Vedas comprise the Samhitas - texts of prayers
and hymns, charms, invocations and sacrificial formulae.
The Rig Veda is the Book of Devotional Verse, the Yajur
Veda is the Book of Sacrificial Formulae, the Sama Veda
is the Book of Chants, and the Atharva Veda is the book
of Mystico-therapeutic Priest craft. Their composition
precedes their arrangement into the four Samhitas by a
long period of oral transmission.
The word Veda is derived from
the root word Vid or Knowledge and is cognate with the
English words wisdom, wit
Then there are the
3 Vedic
appendices
The Aranyakas
The Brahmanas
The Upanishads
The Bhagavad Gita (the Song
Celestial) is actually a part of the Mahabharata
epic (The Great Bharata epic) but by universal
consent and acclaim has attained the status of Shruti
over time because of the eternal verities that it
espouses. The scene develops as a dialogue between Sri
Krishna (the 7th Avatar of lord Vishnu) and Arjuna ,the
Pandava prince and is set in the backdrop of the
Mahabharata War (The Great Bharata War) which
takes place in the battlefield of Kurukshetra not too
far from the environs of present day Delhi. The iconic
significance of this historic dialogue between the Lord
(the manifestation of Brahman) and his disciple (a
metaphor for all of humanity) to the Indic throughout
the ages till the present day is so immense and so
timeless and relevant in its message, that hyperbole
would not suffice to describe the same. It remains
indeed a stirring call to the observance of Dharma in
one's own life. The date for the Mahabharata war remains
unsettled to this day but compelling arguments can be
made for dating it to the end of Kaliyuga circa 3100 BCE.
We will describe some of the methodologies and the
results of these attempts later in the FAQ
Smriti
comprises the rest of the scriptures
There are
eighteen main Smritis, each one named after its
principal author;
Manu Smriti
Yajnavalkya Smriti
Parasara Smriti
Vishnu Smriti
Daksha Smriti
Samvarta Smriti
Vyasa Smriti
Harita Smriti
Satatapa Smriti
Vasishtha Smriti
Yama Smriti
Apastamba Smriti
Gautama Smriti
Devala Smriti
Sankha-Likhita Smriti
Usana Smriti
Atri Smriti
Saunaka Smriti
|
and can be
broadly categorized into
Dharma Shastra (the laws)
Mahakavya (the Epics; they include
Mahabharata and the Ramayana)
Purana (the fables or writings)
Sutra (proverbs or aphorisms)
Agama (the philosophies;
including Mantra, Tantra, and Yantra)
Dyasana or Darshana
(the philosophies; including the Vedanta)
They can also be classified
according to the following taxonomy
The Upa-Vedas
ArthaVeda (the sciences of Economics,
Commerce, Geopolitics and Sociology)
Dhanurveda (the science of War)
GandharvaVeda (the science of Music)
AyurVeda (the science of Medicine)
|
The Vedangas
provide the infrastructure
and disciplines needed to study the Veda
Vyakarana ( the Grammar of Language and
Sanskrit in particular was first codified by Panini
in his Epoch making work , the Ashtadhyayi.
We will have more to say about this extraordinary
individual later under the topics of Mathematics,
and his possible discovery of Zero and the
study of Linguistics. Panini was undoubtedly
one of the earliest grammarians in the
history of the world)
Jyotishi (Astronomy and Astrology)
Nirukta (Etymology and Linguistics)
Shiksha (Phonetics)
Chandas (Metre, chanting of poetry)
KalpaSutra (Ritual procedures)
|
The Darshanas
The Agamas
In Sanskrit
'agama' means acquisition of knowledge. In terms of
religious significance, the Agamas are as important as
the Vedas. They are also not derived from the Vedas. The
Agamas are manuals of divine worship. They deal with
such topics as the codes of temple building, image
making, and the modes of worship. Saivism, Vaishnavism
and Shaktism have their own respective Agamas.
Saivism
recognizes 28 principal Agamas and 150 sub agamas. Some
of them date back to 2nd Century AD. Various schools of
Saivism such as the the Saiva Siddhantha school, Tamil
Saivism, Kashmiri Saivism and Vira Saivism follow these
texts and base their religious activity upon them. The
most prominent agama text in Saivism is the Kamika.
These texts consider Siva as the Supreme Ruler of the
Universe, the Highest Self, the Conscious Principle
while Shakti is regarded as the unconscious or the
natural principle who is the cause of bondage. The union
of Shakti with Siva at the highest level leads to the
freedom of the soul (pasu) from the Pasa or the
attachment.
The Followers
of Shaktism follow 27 Agamas also called Tantras.
Shaktism considers the Mother Goddess as the Supreme
Self and relegates Iswara, the Divine Father, to a
secondary position. In Shaktism the Divine Mother is
both the cause of delusion (maya) and the source of
liberation. Shaktism gave birth to the practice of
Tantric forms of worship which were not generally
acceptable to the followers of Vedic methods of worship.
The Agamas of Shaktism deal with magical and occult
knowledge, besides mechanical, ritualistic, devotional
and spiritual aspects of Tantric forms of worship
The Vaishnava
Agamas are grouped into four categories namely the
Vaikhanasa, Pancharatra, Pratishthasara and
Vijnanalalita. Of these, the Vaishanavites consider the
Pancharatra Agama as the most important (Swami
Sivananda). These Agamas are believed to have been
revealed by Narayana Himself. The Pancharatra Agama is
again subdivided into seven sub agamas namely, the
Brahma, Saiva, Kaumara, Vasishtha, Kapila, Gautamiya and
the Naradiya. The Pancharatra Agamas consider Vishnu as
the Supreme Lord of the Universe and devotion to Vishnu
as the sure path to liberation. According to another
opinion, the Vaikhanasagama is the most ancient and most
important Agama and all the Agamas practically and
literally copied all their information from this sacred
Agama. It is believed that the Vaikhanasa Agama was
originally compiled under the guidance of sage
Vaikhanasa during the early Vedic period. Sri
Madhavacharya held Pancharatra texts in high esteem and
equated them with the Vedas and the epics, while Sri
Shankaracharya had a different opinion.
According to
another classification the Agamas are five types
namely:Sakta Agamas, Soura Agamas, Ganapatya Agamas,
Saiva Agamas and Vaikhanasa Agamas
The Puranas
Bhashyam (commentaries) such
as Sankara's BhAshya of the Bhagavad Gita
To quote Swami Sivananda
The Puranas are of the
same class as the Itihasas (the Ramayana,
Mahabharata, etc.).They have five characteristics (Pancha
Lakshana), namely, history, cosmology (with
various symbolical illustrations of philosophical
principles), secondary creation, genealogy of kings,
and of Manvantaras . All the Puranas belong to the class of
Suhrit-Sammitas, or the Friendly Treatises,
while the Vedas are called the Prabhu-Sammitas
or the Commanding Treatises with great
authority.
Vyasa is the compiler of the
Puranas from age to age; and for this age, he is
Krishna-Dvaipayana, the son of Parasara.
The Puranas were written to
popularize the religion of the Vedas. They contain
the essence of the Vedas. The aim of the Puranas is
to impress on the minds of the masses the teachings
of the Vedas and to generate in them devotion to
God, through concrete examples, myths, stories,
legends, lives of saints, kings and great men,
allegories and chronicles of great historical
events. The sages made use of these parables to
illustrate the eternal principles of religion. The
Puranas were meant, not only for the scholars, but for
the vast majority of the populace who found the
Darshanas too abstract and who could not, for
whatever reason, study the Vedas.
The Darsanas or schools of
philosophy are very abstract. They are meant mainly for
those with an introspective temperament. The Puranas
can be read and appreciated by everybody Religion is taught
in a very easy and interesting way through the
Puranas. Even to this day, the Puranas are popular.
The Puranas contain the history of remote times.
They also give a description of the regions of the
universe not visible to the ordinary physical eye.
They are very interesting to read and are full of
information of all kinds. Children hear the stories
from their grandmothers. Pundits and Purohits hold
Kathas or religious discourses in temples, on
banks of rivers and in other important places. It is
the tradition for bards to recite these stories in
song and poetry.
There are eighteen main
Puranas and an equal number of subsidiary Puranas or
Upa-Puranas. The main Puranas are:
Srimad Bhagavata Purana,
The Srimad
Bhagavata Purana is a chronicle of the various
Avataras of Lord Vishnu. There are ten Avataras
of Vishnu. The aim of every Avatara is to save
the world from some great danger, to destroy the
wicked and protect the virtuous. The ten
Avataras are: Matsya (The Fish), Kurma
(The Tortoise), Varaha (The Boar), Narasimha
(The Man-Lion), Vamana (The Dwarf),
Parasurama (Rama with the axe, the
destroyer of the Kshatriya race), Ramachandra
(the hero of the Ramayanathe son of Dasaratha,
who destroyed Ravana), Sri Krishna, the
teacher of the Gita, Buddha (the
prince-ascetic, founder of Buddhism), and
Kalki (the hero riding on a white horse, who
is to come at the end of the Kali-Yuga).
The object
of the Matsya Avatara was to save Vaivasvata
Manu from destruction by a deluge. The object of
Kurma Avatara was to enable the world to recover
some precious things which were lost in the
deluge. The Kurma gave its back for keeping the
churning rod when the Gods and the Asuras
churned the ocean of milk. The purpose of Varaha
Avatara was to rescue, from the waters, the
earth which had been dragged down by a demon
named Hiranyaksha. The purpose of Narasimha
Avatara, half-lion and half-man, was to free the
world from the oppression of Hiranyakasipu, a
demon, the father of Bhakta Prahlada. The object
of Vamana Avatara was to restore the power of
the gods which had been eclipsed by the penance
and devotion of King Bali. The object of
Parasurama Avatara was to deliver the country
from the oppression of the Kshatriya rulers.
Parasurama destroyed the Kshatriya race
twenty-one times. The object of Rama Avatara was
to destroy the wicked Ravana. The object of Sri
Krishna Avatara was to destroy Kamsa and other
demons, to deliver His wonderful message of the
Gita in the Mahabharata war, and to become the
centre of the Bhakti schools of India. The
object of Buddha Avatara was to prohibit animal
sacrifices and teach piety. The object of the
Kalki Avatara is the destruction of the wicked
and the re-establishment of virtue.
|
Vishnu Purana,
Naradiya Purana,
Garuda (Suparna) Purana,
Padma Purana,
Varaha Purana,
Brahma Purana,
Brahmanda Purana,
Brahma Vaivarta Purana,
Markandeya Purana,
Bhavishya Purana,
Vamana Purana,
Matsya Purana,
Kurma Purana,
Linga Purana,
Siva Purana,
Skanda Purana and
Agni Purana.
|
Itihaasa (epic history)
or Mahakavya
Ramayana
Mahabharata (the Bhagavad Gita
is a part of this monumental epic)
When one adds up all of the
above, it constitutes a substantial corpus of the record
of the Indic civilization ever since the mists of time
and it can be safely asserted with a great deal of
certitude that this is probably the largest body
of extant work, assembled by man in the ancient era
Fables and allegories
Panchatantra
Popular
literature in
Prakrit Languages
The
Popular literature consists of the works
produced in the Prakrit languages, other than
Sanskrit, such as Tamil, Telugu, Hindi, Kannada,
Bengali, and so on by eminent scholars over a
period of more than three thousand years.
Included in this category are both the
translations from the Sanskrit and also original
works. Since it is not possible to deal with the
entire list we are mentioning a few important
works.
Tamil
is the oldest of the South Indian languages and
in terms of antiquity it may be as old as the
Sanskrit itself. A lot of devotional literature
was composed in Tamil by the Nayanars and Alvars
in the early Christian era. The Sangam
literature is a true reflection of the greatness
of Tamil as an excellent medium of devotional
literature.
Any Telugu
literature prior to
Nannayya Bhattarakudus
Andhra Mahabharatamu (1000
to 1100 CE) is not available,
except by royal grants and
decrees. So, Nannayya is known
as Aadi Kavi (the first
poet). The advanced and
well-developed language used by
Nannayya suggests that this may
not be the beginning of Telugu
literature. Andhra
Mahabharatamu was later
furthered by
Tikanna Somayaji (1205
1288) , to be finally
completed by
Yerrapragada (14th
century). Nannaya, Tikanna
and Yerrapragada are known as
the Kavitraya or the
three great poets of Telugu for
this mammoth effort. Other such
translations like
Maranas Markandeya
Puranam,
Ketanas Dasakumara
Charita,
Yerrapragadas Harivamsam
followed.
Literary
activities flourished, during
the rule of Vijayanagara
dynasty.
Krishnadevaraya s time (16th
century) is considered the
golden age in the history of
Telugu literature. The king, a
poet himself, introduced the
Prabandha (a kind of love
poetry) in Telugu literature
with his Amukta Malyada.
His court had the
Ashtadiggajas (literal:
eight elephants) who were the
known to be the greatest of
poets of that time.
Tyagaraja
(1767
1847) of
Thanjavur composed devotional
songs in Telugu, which form a
big part of the repertoire of
Karnatak music.
In
Kannada, another South Indian language, the
Virasaiva movement led to the composition of
Vachakam containing the sayings of Basava.
In the
north notable works in the vernacular languages
included the Ramacharitmanas of Tulisdas and the
Sursagar of Surdas, both in Hindi, Chatanyamrita
of Sri Chaitanya and Mangal kavyas in Bengali,
the devotional compositions of Namdev in
Marathi, the poems of Mirabai in Gujrathi, the
Gitagovinda of Jaidev and so on. Both the epics,
the Ramayana and the Mahabharata were translated
into many local languages. |
-
What
do Hindus understand by religion and what do they
call their religion?
The word religion as it is
understood in the west and in the Judeo Christian
Islamic world does not translate very easily into
any Indian language because of the baggage of dogma and
unquestioning belief that the word religion invokes in
the west. The closest word to Religion is Dharma
which roughly translates into responsibilities and
duties of an individual to the society at large. These
duties are accompanied by a set of ethical values, but
the emphasis in Hinduism is on introspection to
determine the path most suitable for each individual .
Hindus call their Dharma the Sanatana Dharma, the
Eternal Dharma to distinguish it from other Dharmas such
as Buddhism and Jainism and Sikhism
In the words
of Sir John Woodruffe
It has been asserted that
there is no such thing as Indian Religion, though
there are many Religions in India. This is not so.
As I have already pointed out (Is India Civilized?)
there is a common Indian religion which I have
called Bharata Dharma, which is an Aryan religion (Aryadharma)
held by all Aryas whether Brahmanic, Buddhist or
Jaina. These are the three main divisions of the
Bharata Dharma. I exclude other religions in India,
namely, the Semitic religions, Judaism, Christianity
and Islam. Not that all these are purely Semitic.
Christianity became in part Aryanized when it was
adopted by the Western Aryans, as also happened with
Islam when accepted by such Eastern Aryans as the
Persians and the Aryanized peoples of India. Thus
Sufism is either a form of Vedanta or indebted to
it.
The general Indian Religion or Bharata Dharma holds
that the world is an Order or Cosmos. It is not a
Chaos of things and beings thrown haphazard
together, in which there is no binding relation or
rule. The world-order is Dharma, which is that by
which the universe is upheld (Dharyate). Without
Dharma it would fall to pieces and dissolve into
nothingness. But this is not possible, for though
there is Disorder (Adharma), it exists, and can
exist only locally, for a time, and in particular
parts of the whole. Order however will and, from the
nature of things, must ultimately assert itself. And
this is the meaning of the saying that Righteousness
or Dharma prevails. This is in the nature of things,
for Dharma is not a law imposed from without by the
Ukase of some Celestial Czar. It is the nature of
things; that which constitutes them what they are (Svalakshana-dharanat
Dharma). It is the expression of their true being
and can only cease to be, when they themselves cease
to be. Belief in righteousness is then in something
not arbitrarily imposed from without by a Lawgiver,
but belief in a Principle of Reason which all men
can recognize for themselves if they will. Again
Dharma is not only the law of each being but
necessarily also of the whole, and expresses the
right relations of each part to the whole. This
whole is again harmonious, otherwise it would
dissolve. The principle which holds it together as
one mighty organism is Dharma. The particular Dharma
calls for such recognition and action in accordance
therewith. Religion, therefore, which etymologically
means that which obliges or binds together, is in
its most fundamental sense the recognition that the
world is an Order, of which each man, being, and
thing, is a part, and to which each man stands in a
definite, established relation; together with action
based on, and consistent with, such recognition, and
in harmony with the whole cosmic activity. Whilst
therefore the religious man is he who feels that he
is bound in varying ways to all being, the
irreligious man is he who egoistically considers
everything from the standpoint of his limited self
and its interests, without regard for his fellows,
or the world at large. The essentially irreligious
character of such an attitude is shown by the fact
that, if it were adopted by all, it would lead to
the negation of Cosmos, that is Chaos. Therefore all
Religions are agreed in the essentials of morality
and hold that selfishness, in its widest sense, is
the root of all sin (Adharma). Morality is thus the
true nature of man. The general Dharma (Samanya
Dharma) is the universal law governing all, just as
the particular Dharma (Vishesha Dharma) varies with,
and is peculiar to, each class of being. It follows
from what is above stated that disharmony is
suffering. This is an obvious fact. Wrong conduct is
productive of ill, as right conduct is productive of
good. As a man sows, so he will reap. There is an
Immanent Justice. But these results, though they may
appear at once, do not always do so. The fruit of no
action is lost. It must, according to the law of
causality, which is a law of reason, bear effect. If
its author does not suffer for it here and now in
the present life, he will do so in some future one.
Birth and death mean the creation and destruction of
bodies. The spirits so embodied are infinite in
number and eternal. The material universe comes and
goes. This in Brahmanism has been said (see Sanatana
Vaidika Dharma by Bhagavan Das) to be "the Systole
and Diastole of the one Universal Heart, Itself at
rest -- the moveless play of Consciousness". The
appearance and disappearance of the Universe is the
nature or Svabhava of That which it ultimately is.
Its immediate cause is Desire, which Buddhism calls
Trishna -- or Thirst, that is desire or thirst for
world-enjoyment in the universe of form. Action
(Karma) is prompted by desire and breeds again
desire. This action may be good (Dharma) or bad (Adharma)
leading to enjoyment or suffering. Each embodied
soul (Jivatma) will be reborn and reborn into the
world until it is freed from all desire. This
involves the doctrine of Re-incarnation. These
multiple births and deaths in the transmigratory
worlds are called Samsara or Wandering. The world is
a Dvandva, that is, a composite of happiness and
suffering. Happiness of a transitory kind may be had
therein by adherence to Dharma in following Kama
(desire) and Artha (the means) by which lawful
desires may be given effect. These constitute what
Brahmanism calls the Trivarga of the Purushartha, or
three aims of sentient being. But just as desire
leads to manifestation in form, so desirelessness
leads away from it. Those who reach this state seek
Moksha or Nirvana (the fourth Purushartha), which is
a state of Bliss beyond the worlds of changing
forms. For there is a rest from suffering which
Desire (together with a natural tendency to pass its
right limits) brings upon men. They must, therefore,
either live with desire in harmony with the
universal order, or if desireless, they may (for
each is master of his future) pass beyond the
manifest and become That which is Moksha or Nirvana.
Religion, and therefore true civilization, consists
in the upholding of Dharma as the individual and
general good, and the fostering of spiritual
progress, so that, with justice to all beings, true
happiness, which is the immediate and ultimate end
of all Humanity, and indeed of all being, may be
attained.
Anyone who holds these beliefs follows the Bharata
Dharma or common principles of all Aryan beliefs.
Thus as regards God we may either deny His existence
(Atheism) or affirm it (Theism) or say we have no
sufficient proof one way or another (Agnosticism).
It is possible to accept the concept of an eternal
Law (Dharma) and its sanctions in a self-governed
universe without belief in a personal Lord (Ishvara).
So Samkhya, which proceeds on intellectual proof
only, doe not deny God but holds that the being of a
Lord is "not proved".
|
-
Can you elaborate
on the meaning of Dharma
Surely,
here is an excellent essay
by Dr S .Kalyanaraman
-
Do
Hindus pray to God and how do Hindus pray
There is a lot of latitude
in the manner in which one prays to ones God
but this is one way
-
What does
a Hindu hope to attain when he prays ?What is
meant by Purushartha ?
PurushArtha or ManushyArtheha is the
pursuit of the four kinds of human aspirations,
which are dharma, artha, kAma and moksha.
The four pursuits in which humans may legitimately
engage, also called chaturvarga, "four-fold good" , is a
basic principle of Hindu ethics.
- dharma: "Righteous living." The fulfillment of
virtue, good works, duties and responsibilities,
restraints and observances - performing one's part in
the service of society. This includes pursuit of truth
under a guru of a particular Parampara and sAmpradaya.
Dharma is of four primary forms. It is the steady guide
for artha and kama.
- artha: "Wealth." Material welfare and
abundance, money, property, possessions. Artha is the
pursuit of wealth, guided by dharma. It includes the
basic needs - food, money, clothing and shelter - and
extends to the wealth required to maintain a comfortable
home, raise a family, fulfill a successful career and
perform religious duties. The broadest concept of wealth
embraces financial independence, freedom from debt,
worthy children, good friends, leisure time, faithful
servants, trustworthy employees, and the joys of giving,
including tithing (dashamamsha), feeding the poor,
supporting religious mendicants, worshiping devoutly,
protecting all creatures, upholding the family and
offering hospitality to guests. Artha measures not only
riches but quality of life, providing the personal and
social security needed to pursue kama, dharma and moksha.
It allows for the fulfillment of the householder's five
daily sacrifices, pancha mahayajna: to God, ancestors,
devas, creatures and men.
- kAma: "Pleasure, love; enjoyment." Earthly
love, aesthetic and cultural fulfillment, pleasures of
the world (including sexual), the joys of family,
intellectual satisfaction. Enjoyment of happiness,
security, creativity, usefulness and inspiration.
- moksha: "Liberation." Freedom from rebirth
through the ultimate attainment, realization of the Self
God, PArasiva. The spiritual attainments and
superconscious joys, attending renunciation and yoga
leading to Self Realization. Moksha comes through the
fulfillment of dharma, artha and kAma (known in Tamil as
aram, porul and inbam, and explained by Tiruvalluvar in
Tirukural) in the current or past lives, so that one is
no longer attached to worldly joys or sorrows. It is the
supreme goal of life, called paramartha.
Among these,
dharma and the attainment of a dhaarmik life style takes
precedence and is the gateway to moksha or
immortality and eternal bliss. Practice of proper Dharma
gives an experience of peace, joy, strength and
tranquility within ones-self and life becomes
thoroughly disciplined. It is classified as [ i ]
Samanya dharma or the general and Universal Dharma and [
ii ] Visesha dharma or specific personal dharma. Samanya
dharma includes contentment, forgiveness,
self-restraint, spiritual knowledge, absence of anger,
non-greediness, non-stealing, truthfulness, purity,
non-violence, control of senses and desire,
discrimination between right and wrong and between real
and unreal. Visesha or specific dharma includes
duties due to one's birth, age and family and duties to
society and family, due to one's career and job and
spiritual life. They also include the specific dharmas
for the four ashramas and four varnas. These are the
regular duties including the rituals and services to the
family, community, ancestors and God that every one is
expected to perform. .
-
Who
composed the Hindu scriptures and when were they
composed
There were many composers of the
Veda. It was not unusual for the brother of the King to
become the Rishi Chronicler of that reign and compose
the relevant Mandala of the Veda. We will compile the
names of these composers and make these available in
Tabular form.
It
is difficult to ascribe an individual to each and
everyone of the texts, but if there is any one individual
that had a major part in writing the later texts it must
have been VedaVyaasa or Krishna Dvaipayana. Veda Vyasa
(or Baadaarayana) which was also one of his names
composed the Mahabharata and the Brahma Sutras. Veda
Vyasa was born of the union of a fisherwoman and the
sage Parasara. There is as yet no consensus on an
accepted date for the composition of the scriptures. If
one accepts the end of Kaliyuga as a marker for the
Great Bharata War, then the logical date for the
chronicling of the Mahabharata war is around 3139 BCE.
The Vedas predate the Epics by about 2 millennia.
-
What was the
language in which the vast Vedic
scriptures (sruti and smriti ) were composed ?
The language in
which they were written was Sanskrit. More specifically
the Vedas and many of the earlier texts were written in
Vedic Sanskrit before it was codified by Panini. At
that time the scripts were not fully developed and the
transmission of knowledge was primarily oral. The
transition to a likhita Parampara (scriptural tradition)
was of course not instantaneous but took several
centuries. It took several more centuries for
standardized script to evolve from the proto scripts (Brahmi
and Kharoshti)
-
What are the
ethical values of the Hindu
-
Why
are there so many Gods and Goddesses in the
Sanataana Dharma
This is a question
that frankly had never occurred to me till I left India
and lived in the West and to this day I remain
somewhat puzzled as to the reasons why somebody should
ask this question in the first place. What difference
should it make, i would respond with a touch of
asperity. Here is how the sage Yajnavalkya responded to
a query in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. We will meet
Yajnavalkya later in this Chapter
Then
Vidaghdha, son of Shakala, asked him, "How
many gods are there, Yajnavalkya?"
Yajnavalkya, ascertaining the number through
a group of mantras known as the Nivid,
replied, "'As many as it says in the
invocation of the hymn to the Visvedevas of
the gods: three hundred and three, and three
thousand and three."
"Very good," said the son of Shakala, "and
how many gods are there, Yajnavalkya?"
"Thirty-three."
"Very good, and how many gods are there,
Yajnavalkya?"
"Six."
"Very good, and how many gods are there,
Yajnavalkya?"
"Three."
"Very good, and how many gods are there,
Yajnavalkya?"
"Two."
"Very good, and how many gods are there,
Yajnavalkya?"
"One and a half."
"Very good, and how many gods are there,
Yajnavalkya?"
"One." |
There is an
excellent discussion of this topic in Arvind
Sharma's "An introduction to Classical Hindu
Thought", Oxford University Press, 2000 in Chapter
1.In short, a person can choose a deity that
suits his mix of gunas (Rajas, Tamas, and Sattva).
Hinduism does not subscribe to a one size fits all
theory when it comes to personal worship.
-
How did
the name Hindu originate ?
This is a
very pertinent question. In the very distant past (about
7 to 8000 years ago) when there were major cities and
towns along the river valleys of the Saraswathi
and Sindhu Rivers and the Doab surrounded by their
tributaries , the people were known either by the
regional appellations or by their lineage of the royal
house that was ruling the land at that period in
history. I have been referring to the people in the
aggregate as the Vedics. There were many tribes or clans
among the Vedics who went by names such as Bharatas,
Panchalas, Yadus, Druhyus, Anus, etc... These tribes or
clans were very much like the Scottish clans of much
more recent vintage. Many of these clans inhabited an
area that came to be known as the Sapta Sindhu area, the
Sapta standing for the 7 tributaries of the Indus river
at that period in history.
Eventually some of these clans moved westward towards
the area we know now as Iran. Their dialect was slightly
different from those that were left behind. They got
into the habit of pronouncing an 's' as a 'h'. Thus
Sapta Sindhu eventually came to be known as Hepta Hendu
or Hindu for short and the people who inhabited
the area came to be known as Hindus. During that era
there was no religious connotation for the word Hindu. It
was simply a geographic connotation. As the millennia
rolled on, the word Hindu took on a life of its own. The
Arabs began referring to the whole peninsula as al-Hind.
The Latinized version of this was used by the Greeks (Indikos)
and Romans in its present form as India. So also did the
Chinese refer to India and its inhabitants as
Yindu.
The use of
Hindu purely as a reference to those who practiced the
Sanaatana Dharma is a relatively recent development
fostered by the British in their zeal and obsession to
invent distinctions even when the differences were of a
secondary nature. Even as late as 1857 the Moghal
emperor called himself the Emperor of Hindustan,
referring to the Geographical area, rather than as a
home for Hindus.
-
When did
the Sanaatana Dharma originate and who was the
founder of this faith.
The date
when the Dharma was founded is lost in the mists of
antiquity, but it can be assumed very safely that by the
time the Vedas were written, there was already well
established a system of beliefs, so the origin of the
belief system predates the composition by at least a
millennium ,so that we can say that the basic ideas of
the Dharma began to coalesce around 6000 BCE.
There was no
single founder of the faith, but there were a collection
of Rishis and sages who composed the various mandalas of
the Rg.
-
Were the
people who developed the tenets of the Dharma
relatively prosperous in comparison to the poverty
stricken conditions prevalent during much of the
20th century
If we invoke
the notion of the hierarchy of needs most recently
postulated by
Abraham Maslow, we can infer that the Vedics must
have satisfied most of their basic needs relating to
physiological wellbeing and those relating to security
before they could begin contemplating their needs for
self realization or self actualization as Maslow terms
these higher needs
Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

What are some of the
characteristics of a self actualized person according to Maslow;
Truth, rather than
dishonesty.
Goodness, rather than evil.
Beauty, not ugliness or vulgarity.
Unity, wholeness, and transcendence of opposites,
not arbitrariness or forced choices.
Aliveness, not deadness or the mechanization of
life.
Uniqueness, not bland uniformity.
Perfection and necessity, not sloppiness,
inconsistency, or accident.
Completion, rather than incompleteness.
Justice and order, not injustice and lawlessness.
Simplicity, not unnecessary complexity.
Richness, not environmental impoverishment.
Effortlessness, not strain.
Playfulness, not grim, humorless, drudgery.
Self-sufficiency, not dependency.
Meaningfulness, rather than senselessness.
|
While these qualities are for the
most part universally acclaimed as desirable ,there are some
that appear to be quintessentially Vedantic, especially
those dealing with qualities such as Unity, wholeness,
transcendence of opposites, and self sufficiency.
There are quite a few who have remarked on the
relationship of the
Vedantic, in
particular the
Non dualistic
approach, to the
transpersonal
psychology espoused by Maslow.
We will have more to say on the
congruence between Non-dualist conceptions and the Maslow
taxonomy
of
hierarchical needs.
-
What is meant by
the Smarta tradition and who are the Smartas ?
What is the origin of the name ? What are the beliefs of
the Smartas ? How distinct are they and what are the
distinctions
see for instance the
Wiki
encyclopedia
some excerpts
"The Smarta
tradition is a
denomination of the
Hindu
religion. This term is usually used
to denote a certain category of
Brahmanas. Smartas consider the
Vedas supreme. The majority of
members of Smarta community are
followers of
Advaita. In practicality, Smarta and
Advaita have become almost synonymous
because of the prevalence of Advaita
philosophy among Smarta Brahmanas. But
not all believers in Advaita are Smartas.
In ancient times, all Brahmanas who
specialized in the Karma Kanda of the
Vedas, and who followed the Vedas
and Sastras (both
Smriti and
Shruti) came to be known as Smartas.
They therefore should not be confused
with followers of Advaita philosophy who
may not or need not come from this
family tradition." In reality
substantial percentage of Smartas no
longer practice the profession of
Brahmana for a living and have migrated
to other professions such as
Engineering, Law, teaching, research,
academics, and Medicine. They are doing
reasonably well despite draconian
laws of reverse discrimination directed
specially against Brahmanas. Many have
migrated to other countries
Definition
In
Sanskrit smarta
has several meanings
including one who
remembers, a
teacher, and
smarta means
"relating to memory,
recorded in or based on
the
smrti, based on
tradition, prescribed or
sanctioned by
traditional law or
usage, (etc)", from the
root smr
("remember").
Distinction from others
The Smartas consider
themselves followers and
propagators of
Smriti or
religious texts derived
from
Vedic scriptures. It
is from this that the
name is derived. This
term is used with
respect to a certain
specialized category of
Brahmanas. Not all
Brahmanas specialized in
this Smriti tradition.
Some were influenced by
Buddhism,
Jainism or
Charvaka tradition
and philosophy. This did
not mean that all these
people rejected the
authority of Vedas, but
only that their
tradition of worship and
philosophy was based
not on smriti texts.
In time,
Shankaracharya
brought all the Vedic
communities together. He
tried to remove the non-smriti
aspects that had crept
into the Hindu
communities. He also
endeavoured to unite
them by arguing that any
of the different Hindu
gods could be
worshipped, according to
the prescriptions given
in the smriti texts. He
established that worship
of various deities are
compatible with Vedas
and is not
contradictory, since all
are different
manifestations of one
nirguna Brahman.
Shankaracharya was
instrumental in reviving
interest in the smritis,
and the entire Vedic
community rallied around
him and are known as
Smartas. Also,his
philosophy of Advaita
was also followed by all
the smartas. And even
those smartas who did
not follow the Advaita
philosophy considered
Shankaracharya as a
guiding light for
reviving the smriti
texts and tradition.
Thus, a bedrock of
Smartas who also follow
Advaita philosophy, is
their belief in the
essential sameness of
all
deities, the
unity of
Godhead, and their
conceptualization of the
myriad
deities of India as
various manifestations
of the one divine power.
Smartas accept and
worship the six
manifestations of
God, (Ganesha,
Shiva,
Shakti,
Vishnu,
Surya and
Skanda) and the
choice of the nature of
God is up to the
individual worshipper
since different
manifestations of God
are held to be
equivalent. Thus, it is
false to say that
Hinduism has 330 million
gods, which are more
correctly
devas or celestial
beings; even the liberal
Smarta denomination only
considers six forms of
God to be objects of
worship and consider it
to be derived from one
nirguna Brahman; where
as other denominations
of Hinduism, such as
Vaishnavism and
Shaivism follows
worship of a single
manifestation of God,
but both are ultimately
monotheistic."
It is
our view that a
taxonomy based on
mono/polytheism is not
suitable for the Dharma
where the multiplicity
of the deities is not
central to the belief or
value system and the
choice of deity by and
large is left to the
individual so as
to act as a suitable
symbol for his daily
worship. This is a
source of much
misunderstanding and
bewilderment for the
west which refuses to
recognize the multiple
identities of a
person and insists on a
one size fits all
taxonomy and as a
consequence insists on
pigeon holing a person
as a mono or polytheist
and then having
done so insists that he
or she is a child of a
lesser God (or worse).
-
Does Hinduism
expect or demand exclusive allegiance as some
faiths do and does it take the approach of, 'unless
you believe in Me you are damned to perdition'
No. The
Dharma does not take an exclusivist 'one size fits
all' approach. The Dharma recognized the immense
diversity in the human species and that different
paths to self realization are appropriate depending
on the many factors surrounding the individual human
being. There are many potential paths that are
prescribed, including Naastik belief systems , which
do not recognize the primacy of the Vedas and their
central place as the 'Sruti'.
The
emphasis in the Dharma is on one's behavior and
one's actions. There is implicit in the teaching of
the Dharma , the belief that certain behaviors and
actions are more efficacious in attaining one's
Moksha and that others are harmful to the
realization of the true Self, but it does not ask
the aspirant to abandon his/her set of beliefs and
start with a clean slate. There is definitely no
Dhaarmik sanction to say for instance, you are the
child of a lesser God ,merely because you do not
call yourself a Hindu, a belief that is very
explicit in some other faiths. This is a major
distinction between Hinduism and the other great
religions of the world.. Hinduism is not
merely tolerant of other faiths, but it embraces the
diversity inherent in the many ideologies inherent
in a civilization.
It is probably true to say that
throughout the ages it has been the most accepting of all
major faiths, so much so that competing
ideologies like Communism have sought to portray this as a
weakness of the Hindu and have sought to take undue
advantage of it. It is however a grave mistake to assume
that this is a sign of docility on the part of the
Hindu. History indicates otherwise. For instance, the
Sassanian Persian empire succumbed within a period of two
years to the onslaught of the followers of Mohammad,
whereas it took them 500 years to reach the gates of Delhi.
The Indic civilization remains the only extant civilization
in the modern world, to survive from an ancient era, and it
has done so in the face of incredible odds. Today, the
tradition is under siege from a wide array of
formidable adversaries of whom the most formidable are the
children and descendants of our fellow Hindu brothers and
sisters. If you accept what i have said so far , I would
entreat you my fellow Hindus never to denigrate
your tradition publicly (or even privately for that matter).
That in fact is what most adherents of other faiths are
already doing and it remains merely a matter of emulating a
sound strategy.
-
You say sutras are aphorisms and were
used in the interest of brevity.can you elaborate
Posted by
Poster Sunder in India-Forum.com
The Ability
to conceive and keep up with a technique of
documentation called Sutras is surely a
technological and linguistic marvel of high
order. Sutras are compilation of major works
where very few words are used. (If it's not
readily interpreted without proper
background needed for the subject, Sutras
may seem confusing.) Some of the Famous
sutras are
(*) Yoga Sutra - Pathanjali.
(*) Brahma Sutra - Bhadharayana.
(*) Bhakthi Sutra - Naradha.
(*) Kama Sutra - Vatsyayana.
(*) Neethi Sutras - Chanakya.
Here is the definition of a Sutra.
alpaaksharam asandigdham saaravath
vishvatho mukham,
asathobham anavadhyam cha sutram sutravidho
viduh.
Those who know the definition of a sutra
define it as possessing the following
qualities..
Alpa aksharam = With bare minimum (use of)
alphabets.
Asannigdham = Free from doubts and
ambiguities; clear and accurate.
Saravad = like the essence; devoid of
unnecessary pulp.
Viswatho mukham = Universal; applicable
anywhere and everywhere. [Not limited by
time, space, cultures etc.]
Asathobham = Shining, Illuminating,
highlighting the point at hand, never
diminishing in radiance/value.
Anavadyam = Without any bugs, errors,
mistakes or shortcomings; perfect.
|
-
What is the situation regarding the Caste system in
Hindu society ? Was such a system endorsed by the ancient
Vedics in any of the scriptures. Did the Hindu
scriptures endorse Untouchability ?
Because of
the social stratifications resulting from 800 years of alien domination, this
needs an answer along with its historical context . Pl. refer
to the section on Caste for a complete discussion on Caste
-
What are the central core tenets of the Sanatana
Dharma ? If you had to pick the most important 5 among them which ones would
you pick
Central Core Beliefs of Sanatana
Dharma
Belief in a Supreme Brahman and the
relationship between the Atman and the Brahman (the essential divinity of the
human spirit)
Freedom to choose an Ishta Devata(
personal Deity) realizing such freedom could result in different choices of
deities
Belief in Free Will and its
relationship to Karma( personal responsibility and accountability)
Freedom to pursue Purushartha or
Chaturvarga (the four goals of life dharma, artha, kama and moksha) on the path
to Self Realization
Freeedom to choose the
appropriate path (Karma Yoga, Jnana Yoga, Bhakti Yoga, Raja Yoga) or
combination thereof toachieve Self Fulfillment depending on onesVasanas
Observe the ethical
responsibilities enjoined by the Dharma (Ethics, integrity and building of
character)
-
Do Hindus have a Chief among all Swamis, like a
Pope, sort of a Parama Rishi if you will ?
No. The Dharma does not believe
in interposing another entity between the Atman and the ParamAtman, another
individual however learned though he may be. The Guru points the path, lights
the way ,and may even suggest the appropriate goals, but no other person
can dictate these to any individual. The Freedom to choose is the single
most important characteristic of the Hindu faith. Hinduism does not believe in a
one size fits all doctrine, and does not demand a uniformity in worship, a
catechism. There are thousands of appropriate slokas to choose from or if one so
desires one can write one's own sloka. It is recommended however that there be a
disciplinary approach and that a certain time be set aside for meditation and
prayer, preferably at the same time and place everyday, and that the same
prayer be chanted until it can be repeated by rote. This is where a Guru's
guidance is highly recommended. One cannot become a Doctor before writing
the board exams. Remember ,the Dharma reminds us all we are potentially divine
and it is our own Avidya that creates a veil and blurs the vision where we ought
to go.
-
We have all heard of the great philosopher
statesman of India ,and in modern times we have had such statesmen as Sarvepalli
Radhakrishnan..
Can you name one such person from the ancient times.
The most famous of the
philosopher statesman of India was by far Chanakya. But there is one who was
less well known especially amongst western audiences and he is Bhartrihari. In
an era when Indics with versatile interests were relatively abundant,
Bhartrihari stands out as a genius of great versatility. Linguist, philosopher,
king, this man did it all .we will put together a collage of Bhartrihari who was
a contemporary of Varahamihira . in the meantime
here is a snapshot of his
life and times
-
What are the methods of acquiring knowledge
(pramAna) in the various
Dhaarmik faiths
I. JAINISM: 3
pramANas
1. pratyaksha
(perception)
2. anumAna (inference)
3. JinashAsana (Teachings of the 24 TIrthankaras)
II. BUDDHISM: 3
pramANas
1. pratyaksha
2. anumAna
3. Buddhavacana (Teachings of the Buddha) (shruti)
III.
NYAAYA-VAISHESHHIKA: 4 pramANas
1. pratyaksha
2. anumAna
3. upamAna (analogy)
4. shabda (testimony--sacred [shruti and smRti] & secular)
*
Perception, called PratyakSha, occupies the foremost position in the Nyaya
epistemology. Perception is defined by sense-object contact and is unerring.
Perception can be of two types:
o Ordinary (Laukika or Sadharana), of six types, viz., visual-by eyes,
olfactory-by nose, auditory-by ears, tactile-by skin, gustatory-by tongue and
mental-by mind.
o Extra-ordinary (Alaukika or Asadharana), of three types, viz., Samanyalakshana
(perceiving generality from a particular object), Jñanalakshana (when one sense
organ can also perceive qualities not attributable to it, as when seeing a
chili, one knows that it would be bitter or hot), and Yogaja (when certain human
beings, from the power of Yoga, can perceive past, present and future and have
supernatural abilities, either complete or some). Also, there are two modes or
steps in perception, viz., Nirvikalpa, when one just perceives an object without
being able to know its features, and Savikalpa, when one is able to clearly know
an object. All laukika and alaukika pratyakshas are savikalpa. There is yet
another stage called Pratyabhijña, when one is able to re-recognise something on
the basis of memory.
* Inference, called AnumAna, is one of the most important contributions of Nyaya.
It can be of two types - inference for oneself (Svarthanumana, where one does
not need any formal procedure, and at the most the last three of their 5 steps),
and inference for others (Parathanumana, which requires a systematic methodology
of 5 steps). Inference can also be classified into 3 types: Purvavat (infering
an unperceived effect from a perceived cause), Sheshavat (infering an
unperceived cause from a perceived effect) and Samanyatodrishta (when inference
is not based on causation but on uniformity of co-existence). A detailed anaysis
of error is also given, explaining when anumAna could be false.
* Comparison or Analogy, which is the rough translation of Upamana. It is the
knowledge of the relationship between a word and the object denoted by the word.
It is produced by the knowledge of resemblance or similarity, given some
pre-description of the new object beforehand.
* Word, or Shabda are also accepted as a pramana. It can be of two types,
Vaidika (Vedic), which are the words of the four sacred Vedas, and are described
as the Word of God, having been composed by God, and Laukika, or words and
writings of trustworthy human beings.
IV. SANKHYA-YOGA:
3 pramANas
1. pratyaksha
2. anumAna
3. shabda (shruti)
V. PRABHAKARA
MIIMAMSA: 5 pramANas
1. pratyaksha
2. anumAna
3. upamAna
4. arthApatti (implication)
5. shabda (shruti)
VI. KUMARILA
MIIMAMSA: 6 pramANas
1. pratyaksha
2. anumAna
3. upamAna
4. arthApatti
5. shabda (shruti)
6. anupalabdhi (non-apprehension)
VII. SANKARA
(ADVAITA) VEDANTA: 6 pramANas
(same as the 6
of KumArila MImAmsA). "vyAvahAre bhATTanayaH".
VIII. RAMANUJAM
(VISHISHT ADVAITA) VEDANTA: 3 pramANas
1. pratyaksha
2. anumAna
3. shabda (shruti)
IX. MADHAVA
(DVAITA) VEDANTA: 3 pramANas
1. pratyaksha
2. anumAna
3. shabda (shruti)
Thus
there is an underlying congruence among all the Indic belief systems at
least as far as the acquisition of knowledge goes, which is why i use the term
Indic ethos to indicate a homogeneity among all faiths originating in the Indian
subcontinent. We will have more to say on the various approaches to knowledge
acquisition a little later. This is not to say that there are not significant
differences, but the fundamental postulates that they make about the universe
are not dissimilar
-
What
is Vairagya ? What role does it play in Hindu ethics
Are
Brahmanas the Dalits of today ? Read for yourself and make
up your own mind
continued here FAQ on Hinduism (2)
View My Stats
|